Archives

April 2004 (7)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (12)
January 2004 (22)
December 2003 (19)
November 2003 (16)
October 2003 (26)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (38)
July 2003 (80)
June 2003 (13)
May 2003 (24)
April 2003 (76)
March 2003 (75)
February 2003 (51)
January 2003 (73)

Category

Family (5)
FYI (18)
Games (2)
Geek (88)
Geographic (3)
Hacks (13)
Home (15)
Humor (54)
Ideas (20)
Ideaspace (15)
Local (15)
Metadata (10)
Microsoft (2)
MovableType (5)
Nitwits (66)
PKI (2)
Politics (22)
Quotes (3)
RDF (15)
RSS (4)
Security (3)
Semantic Web (13)
Site Info (13)
Social Networks (1)
Spam (9)
Sysadmin (1)
Tips (2)
Tivo (2)
TMFTOTHD (1)
To Do (1)
Unlisted (1)
Web (3)
Windows (1)

Local

« MetroBlogs »
DC metroblogs
beltway bloggers

Links


Assorted bits

Blogroll Me!
GeoURL
Listed on BlogShares




January 17, 2003

Just what does knows mean?

I like what the foaf RDF experiment is trying to do. The concept of being able to share assorted bits of lists and knowledge about who you are and who you know is a pretty cool idea. What troubles me though is the lack of clarification on what a foaf:knows group actually means.

Just what does "knows" mean? Do I know the person as a lifelong friend? Are the a coworker, client, customer or just some shlub off the street? Do I know them as an aquantaince or is it more that I "know of them" via participating in certain social circles? I'd really like a way to make it less fuzzy.

I'd like to see a way to 'group' the people and define some semantics on that group. Maybe it's as simple as using things from HumanML, WordNet or Global WordNet in ways that help define what the group means. There may well be other bits of markup that are better suited, I'd certainly be interested in hearing about them.

There's a website that allows browsing WordNet. I did a query on the word 'membership' and got some interesting results. From membership it led to Social group, Assemblage, Group and Grouping. I followed into Social group and found Interest group which might be one way to describe how I know some of the foaf and RDF folks.

I suppose I'd indicate that I belong to or somehow know the group instead of just establishing a group of my own. I could then enhance what I truly know about individuals by having a link to them in my own groups. Thus I might indicate I'm a member of a given interest group. The interest group's own data would show me as a member. I'd then add a group of collaborators, perhaps, and put some people in it. I might even go so far as to mark up a foaf:Project as being associated with this collaborators group. This is undoubtedly more along the lines of what people want but can't do with foaf:knows as it currently stands.

I'm open to suggestions as to an easy way to leverage the foaf:knows contruct into something that conveys more meaning.


Perma  | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 10:28 AM  | xml
Comments
Post a comment






* if you do not leave a valid e-mail or URL your comment may be deleted *







Navigation

Recent Entries

America and Europe: Vive la différence?
Server changes afoot
Diet behavior mod
Googling for sensitive info
Outlook 2003 and IMAP, a marriage made in Hell
Bike to Work Day, May 7th
Speakeasy rocks
Zippo USB?
When geographic data is nowhere 'near' correct
Local campaign contributions

User comments
Trackbacks

Contact

send me an e-mail E-mail
chat with me using MS messenger MSN Messenger
chat with me via AIM America Online
chat with me on ICQ ICQ
chat with me on Yahoo! Yahoo
Add my vCard to your electronic addressbook vCard
Friend of a Friend FoaF

Syndication

XML  RDF  CDF

Comments

XFML

Extra Stuff

foaf
vCard
pgp info
Linked In
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64