Archives

April 2004 (7)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (12)
January 2004 (22)
December 2003 (19)
November 2003 (16)
October 2003 (26)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (38)
July 2003 (80)
June 2003 (13)
May 2003 (24)
April 2003 (76)
March 2003 (75)
February 2003 (51)
January 2003 (73)

Category

Family (5)
FYI (18)
Games (2)
Geek (88)
Geographic (3)
Hacks (13)
Home (15)
Humor (54)
Ideas (20)
Ideaspace (15)
Local (15)
Metadata (10)
Microsoft (2)
MovableType (5)
Nitwits (66)
PKI (2)
Politics (22)
Quotes (3)
RDF (15)
RSS (4)
Security (3)
Semantic Web (13)
Site Info (13)
Social Networks (1)
Spam (9)
Sysadmin (1)
Tips (2)
Tivo (2)
TMFTOTHD (1)
To Do (1)
Unlisted (1)
Web (3)
Windows (1)

Local

« MetroBlogs »
DC metroblogs
beltway bloggers

Links


Assorted bits

Blogroll Me!
GeoURL
Listed on BlogShares




February 02, 2003

Cutting off the meta nose to spite the meta face?

It seems the people afraid of what abuses could be done with metadata are continuing to think it's pointless to even bother to try. This is stupid. Once again we find people too worried about what could go wrong to ever take the chance. Innovation doesn't come from sitting around being afraid to try.

Nitwits
Perma  | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) | 10:59 AM  | xml
Comments

Bill, can you elaborate a bit more on synthetic meta-data? I'm interested in your comment to Adina's post but felt I was understanding it fully. Thanks. Send an email if you can. Thanks.

Posted by: Greg Elin on February 3, 2003 12:04 PM

Sure, the elaboration is that synthetic metadata does not work. An overly simply analogy would be to ask a synthetic search to find results on "queer". Now, depending on it's focus you may get some rather different results.

A better example comes from the childrens fable "the boy that cried wolf". The boy was wrong so many times that the villagers eventually didn't listen to him. This is what naive synthetic searches end up doing. The users, whose search forming skills are certainly at fault, ask for something and the results do not help them. They quickly learn not to search because the results won't be what they want.

I greatly simplify it with this argument and I do appreciate more sophisticated search methods can help.

My point, however, is that there's a contingent of people that 'whine' about it being somehow too hard to implement metadata. Or that if they offer up metadata it might somehow be used in unintended ways. As a result they'd prefer nothing get done. Yet they want search results to be correct. This disparity is what bugs me.

Posted by: Bill Kearney on February 3, 2003 12:16 PM
Post a comment






* if you do not leave a valid e-mail or URL your comment may be deleted *







Navigation

Recent Entries

America and Europe: Vive la différence?
Server changes afoot
Diet behavior mod
Googling for sensitive info
Outlook 2003 and IMAP, a marriage made in Hell
Bike to Work Day, May 7th
Speakeasy rocks
Zippo USB?
When geographic data is nowhere 'near' correct
Local campaign contributions

User comments
Trackbacks

Contact

send me an e-mail E-mail
chat with me using MS messenger MSN Messenger
chat with me via AIM America Online
chat with me on ICQ ICQ
chat with me on Yahoo! Yahoo
Add my vCard to your electronic addressbook vCard
Friend of a Friend FoaF

Syndication

XML  RDF  CDF

Comments

XFML

Extra Stuff

foaf
vCard
pgp info
Linked In
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64