Archives

April 2004 (7)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (12)
January 2004 (22)
December 2003 (19)
November 2003 (16)
October 2003 (26)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (38)
July 2003 (80)
June 2003 (13)
May 2003 (24)
April 2003 (76)
March 2003 (75)
February 2003 (51)
January 2003 (73)

Category

Family (5)
FYI (18)
Games (2)
Geek (88)
Geographic (3)
Hacks (13)
Home (15)
Humor (54)
Ideas (20)
Ideaspace (15)
Local (15)
Metadata (10)
Microsoft (2)
MovableType (5)
Nitwits (66)
PKI (2)
Politics (22)
Quotes (3)
RDF (15)
RSS (4)
Security (3)
Semantic Web (13)
Site Info (13)
Social Networks (1)
Spam (9)
Sysadmin (1)
Tips (2)
Tivo (2)
TMFTOTHD (1)
To Do (1)
Unlisted (1)
Web (3)
Windows (1)

Local

« MetroBlogs »
DC metroblogs
beltway bloggers

Links


Assorted bits

Blogroll Me!
GeoURL
Listed on BlogShares




February 12, 2003

How to get better addresses in feeds?

There's one aspect of RSS that confounds me. How to get in contact with the authors of the feeds. That is, without leaping through flaming hoops and mindless web page comment forms. My perspective is a bit narrower than what the public might want. I'm looking to find a reliable way to have programmed code pick up on the addresses.

I think there's a way to do this but it might be a little work. My thought is to start making more use of things link Foaf in your RSS feeds.

Here's what I'm thinking:

Create a feed.
Create an sha1hash of an e-mail address you'd be willing to use for this purpose.
Put that hashed address in the feed.
Now use that same address to sign up with a trusted third party.
The third party could use your hash to provide it's trusted users with a way to reflect e-mail to you.

An alternative angle might be sort of the same but more secure.

Create a feed.
Get a PGP key
Put that PGP key in for your contact info
Sign up with a trusted third party and offer up that key and an e-mail address you'd be willing to use to receive mail.
Put that third party's public key on your PGP keyring.
Then configure your inbox to reject any and all mail that's not from addresses already on your keyring.
Optionally accept mail from senders only if their PGP key has been signed by someone else you already trust.

In this case it'd allow for some quite rigid control over what mail would ever get delivered to you. You'd be able to reject it out of hand if it lacked the right key signatures.

This is not trivial stuff, I'll grant you. But SPAM is out of control and there's no end of it's madness in sight. So instead of punishing each other by depriving ourselves of using e-mail let's escalate the arms race a bit. Let's move up to using trusted signatures. This way there will be more of a digital paper trail back to abusive senders. There's still room for hacks, of course, but with the ability to revoke and block messages based on keys you stand a much better chance than plain text e-mail alone.


Perma  | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | 07:26 PM  | xml
Comments
Post a comment






* if you do not leave a valid e-mail or URL your comment may be deleted *







Navigation

Recent Entries

America and Europe: Vive la différence?
Server changes afoot
Diet behavior mod
Googling for sensitive info
Outlook 2003 and IMAP, a marriage made in Hell
Bike to Work Day, May 7th
Speakeasy rocks
Zippo USB?
When geographic data is nowhere 'near' correct
Local campaign contributions

User comments
Trackbacks

Contact

send me an e-mail E-mail
chat with me using MS messenger MSN Messenger
chat with me via AIM America Online
chat with me on ICQ ICQ
chat with me on Yahoo! Yahoo
Add my vCard to your electronic addressbook vCard
Friend of a Friend FoaF

Syndication

XML  RDF  CDF

Comments

XFML

Extra Stuff

foaf
vCard
pgp info
Linked In
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64