Archives

April 2004 (7)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (12)
January 2004 (22)
December 2003 (19)
November 2003 (16)
October 2003 (26)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (38)
July 2003 (80)
June 2003 (13)
May 2003 (24)
April 2003 (76)
March 2003 (75)
February 2003 (51)
January 2003 (73)

Category

Family (5)
FYI (18)
Games (2)
Geek (88)
Geographic (3)
Hacks (13)
Home (15)
Humor (54)
Ideas (20)
Ideaspace (15)
Local (15)
Metadata (10)
Microsoft (2)
MovableType (5)
Nitwits (66)
PKI (2)
Politics (22)
Quotes (3)
RDF (15)
RSS (4)
Security (3)
Semantic Web (13)
Site Info (13)
Social Networks (1)
Spam (9)
Sysadmin (1)
Tips (2)
Tivo (2)
TMFTOTHD (1)
To Do (1)
Unlisted (1)
Web (3)
Windows (1)

Local

« MetroBlogs »
DC metroblogs
beltway bloggers

Links


Assorted bits

Blogroll Me!
GeoURL
Listed on BlogShares




July 30, 2003

She loves RDF! She hates RDF!

I've a lot of respect for the things Shelley's contributed over time. Her contributions to the unix book are something I've valued for nigh on a decade. But her flip-flopping on things related to RDF continues to be rather tedious. In the article
And now more FOAF we find Shelley pulling the old "raises concern" arguments. Sheesh, give us a break. It's odd that someone interested in the sales of an RDF-oriented book would take such hostile positions on matters related to it. But hey, such is life I suppose.


Perma  | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0) | 12:06 PM  | xml
Comments (scroll down to see all 4 comments...)

Interesting. You pulled "I love RDF! I hate RDF!" from me expressing legitimate concerns about the social implications of FOAF, and social networks?

Bill, if people don't raise concerns, technology never becomes tempered or refined. It just flaps along, loose, untested, and barely usable.

Sort of like another XML vocabulary where concerns are discouraged by the creator.

Posted by: Shelley on July 30, 2003 12:18 PM

No, I didn't pull the quote from you. It's one thing to raise concerns. It's another to flip-flop back and forth. The whipsawing effect just tires everyone out. As opposed to other vocabulary effort (annoying in it's own right), the wishy-washy shifts from you are probably just as bad, if not worse.

Posted by: Bill Kearney on July 30, 2003 02:59 PM

Bill, I shouldn't get into this conversation with you, because it's not a win/win for either of us -- I had my say, you had yours. But I look at what I wrote, and what you said, and it doesn't even click. Which means, there's no point in trying to have conversation, and this is something I'm having to learn.

Posted by: Shelley on July 30, 2003 04:32 PM

Again with the fatalistic "why bother" tone. You've a habit of waxing and waning on the enthusiasm scale. First you love it! Then you hate it! Then everyone's getting it wrong! Then it's all rosy again!

That gets rather tiresome and is the point of why I posted. We've spoken about this before and if you'd prefer a voice conversation I'd certainly welcome it again.

Posted by: Bill Kearney on July 30, 2003 06:18 PM
Post a comment






* if you do not leave a valid e-mail or URL your comment may be deleted *







Navigation

Recent Entries

America and Europe: Vive la différence?
Server changes afoot
Diet behavior mod
Googling for sensitive info
Outlook 2003 and IMAP, a marriage made in Hell
Bike to Work Day, May 7th
Speakeasy rocks
Zippo USB?
When geographic data is nowhere 'near' correct
Local campaign contributions

User comments
Trackbacks

Contact

send me an e-mail E-mail
chat with me using MS messenger MSN Messenger
chat with me via AIM America Online
chat with me on ICQ ICQ
chat with me on Yahoo! Yahoo
Add my vCard to your electronic addressbook vCard
Friend of a Friend FoaF

Syndication

XML  RDF  CDF

Comments

XFML

Extra Stuff

foaf
vCard
pgp info
Linked In
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64